Auto Negligence Law
 
Silva Guerrero-Ramirez v. 99 Cent Only Stores, LLC

Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court, A-22-857398-C, and was removed to federal court by 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC.

The civil law of negligence is based upon the concept that a reasonably prudent person should act in a certain way. Negligence... More...
   $0 (03-27-2024 - NV)

Glen Ralph Bertrand v. Colette Renee Bertrand and Shannon Gartner d/b/a Bear Creek Trucking

Billings, Montana personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Montana follows a “modified” comparative negligence rule, which means that a plaintiff can recover damages only if their degree of fault is less than 50%. If the plaintiff's fault is found to be 50% or more, they are barred from recovering any damages.

This case was filed... More...
   $0 (03-27-2024 - MT)

Joseph Dory and Gregory Jones v. United States of America

Boise, Idaho personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theories.

Idaho follows the modified comparative negligence rule. Under this rule, a plaintiff (the injured party) can only recover damages if their percentage of fault is less than 50%. If the plaintiff is found to be 50% or more responsible for the accident, they cannot recover ... More...
   $1 (03-27-2024 - ID)

United States of America v. Adam Reed; William Dodd

Indianapolis, Indiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with .



Adam Reed and William Dodd have both been sentenced for their roles in a string of armed robberies across Indianapolis in the summer of 2020.

Adam Re... More...   $0 (03-27-2024 - IN)

Luis Dvid Ruiz v. Allied Van Lines, Inc., et al.

Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 8th Judicial District Court, A-22-853257-C, and was removed to federal court by Allied Van Lines, Inc. et al.

Under Nevada law, a car accident victim can only recover damages if their percentage of fault is less than 50%. If a victim is... More...
   $1 (03-26-2024 - NV)

Devin Whittier v. Seattle Tunnel Partners, et al.

Seattle, Washington personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the King County Superior Court, 17-00002-04219-6, and was removed by Seattle Tunnel Partners, et al.

If a person acts carelessly and injures someone as a direct result of that carelessness, the careless party must pay compensation to the injured party. “... More...
   $0 (03-26-2024 - WA)

Irene Macias v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

San Francisco, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Superior Court of California, Contra Costa County, C22-02469, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Premises liability laws in California are based on negligence, which is represented under Civil Code §1714(a). I... More...
   $1 (03-26-2024 - CA)

Debra Brittenham v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Sacramento, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Kern County Superior Court, BCV-22-102269 DZ, and was removed to federal court by Home Depot.

Premises liability laws in California are based on negligence, which is represented under Civil Code §1714(a). In a premises liability c... More...
   $0 (03-25-2024 - CA)

Brittany Ramirez v. Indochino Apparel, Inc.

Los Angeles, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Los Angeles Superior Court, 23STCV22093, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

There are four basic elements of negligence under California state law: duty, breach, causation, and damages. Duty demonstrates the expectation to use reas... More...
   $0 (03-25-2024 - CA)

Michael McMann v. United States of America

Los Angeles, California personal lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a federal tort claims act auto negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

... More...
   $0 (03-25-2024 - CA)

Amanda Wilson v. Cahoon Enterprises, LLC and Hayden Scott Parks

Fargo, North Dakota personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

North Dakota is a modified comparative negligence state It allocates fault to all parties involved, thus reducing how much each party can recover from the car accident. Since North Dakota is a modified comparative negligence state, drivers can claim damages so long as they were only ... More...
   $0 (03-25-2024 - ND)

Kimberly Ann Zugschwert v. United States of America

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

... More...
   $1 (03-24-2024 - MN)

Troma Riss v. Ecklund Logistics, Inc., et al.

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

Minnesota follows the “comparative negligence” rule. Under this system, a plaintiff's compensation can be reduced by a percentage that equals their share of fault in causing the accident. If a plaintiff is found to be more than 50% at fault, they are barred fro... More...
   $1 (03-24-2024 - MN)

Alexander Irvine and Barbara Twaddell v. University of Washington

Seattle, Washington personal injury lawyer presented the Plaintiffs who sued on negligence theories.

This case was filed in the King County Superior Court, 24-00002-03365-3, and was removed to federal court by the University of Washington.

The jurisdiction of the court upon removal was challenged by the Plaintiffs.
... More...
   $0 (03-22-2024 - WA)

Maria D. Mendez Gil v. United States of America

Yakima, Washington personal injury car wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

... More...
   $1 (03-22-2024 - WA)

Michael Griffith, Sr., et al. v. Steffan Viernes, et al.

Sacramento, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence theory.


Under this law, the amount of compensation an injured party can receive is determined by their level of fault in relation to the accident. For example, if a court determines that the injured party is 20% at fault, their total damages award will be reduced by 20%.... More...
   $0 (03-22-2024 - CA)

Nancy Ihnken v. Kohl's Inc.

Peoria, Illinois personal injury slip and fall law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

Premises liability law revolves around holding property owners and operators accountable if their careless or negligent actions cause harm to those who have a right to be on the premises. As with any personal injury case in Illinois, a premises liability... More...
   $1 (03-22-2024 - IL)

Natasha K. Dominguez v. Landstar Systems, Inc., et al.

Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the District Court, Clark County, Nevada, A-22-855311-C, and was removed to federal court by Landstar System, Inc. et al.

Under Nevada law, a car accident victim can only recover damages if their percentage of fault is less than 50%. If a v... More...
   $0 (03-21-2024 - NV)

William Howard Schock v. United States of America

Tucson, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

... More...
   $1 (03-21-2024 - AZ)

Patricia Styers v. Dolgencorp., LLC d/b/a Dollar General

Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury lawyers sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Saline County Circuit Court, 63CV-22-01168-2, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Premises liability is a form of personal injury law in Arkansas that deals with accidents that occur on property owned by an individual or a legal ent... More...
   $1 (03-20-2024 - AR)

Daniel Reed v. Storey Trucking Company, Inc.

Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Negligence, the legal theory behind most injury lawsuits, is the violation of a duty owed to another individual. In other words, to do something (or not do something) a "reasonable person" wouldn't (or would) do -- such as driving drunk or failing to ensure the safety ... More...
   $1 (03-20-2024 - AR)

Stephanie Rein v. Walmart, Inc.

East St. Louis, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court, Franklin County, Illinois, case number 22-LA-56, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

(740 ILCS 130/1)

Sec. 1. This Act is called and may be cited as the "Premises Liability Act".

S... More...
   $1 (03-20-2024 - IL)

Daniel Herron v. Tears of Eden, et al.

Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Hamilton Circuit Court, 29C01-2305-CT-004403, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Premises liability law in Indiana is designed to protect individuals who are injured on another person's property due to the propert... More...
   $0 (03-20-2024 - IN)

Rhoddy Dance v. Sharkey Transportation, Inc.

Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Marion Superior Court 2, 49D02-2110-CT-036154, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Indiana follows the rule of modified comparative fault, which is also used by 32 other states. Under Indiana law, you may recover dam... More...
   $1 (03-20-2024 - IN)

Iram Sheikh v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, et al.

Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was file in the Maricopa County Superior Court, CV2022-091842, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

In Arizona, property owners and occupiers have a duty to protect visitors from injuries arising from known dangers on their property. Whe... More...
   $0 (03-19-2024 - AZ)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: