Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

Colorado state law uses 50% modified comparative negligence. That means that if a driver is over 50% at fault for an accident, they give up their right to receive compensation for damages. Other states throughout the country have similar regulations in place regarding traffic accidents.
... More...   $0 (04-22-2024 - CO)

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.

According to a press release from the Buzbee Law Firm, which represented the woman who was injured, Lorelle Thompson, the jury returned a verdict that awarded Thompson $45 million in punitive damages. The previous largest verdict in Colorado Springs was $33 million in 2019.

... More...   $0 (04-21-2024 - CO)

Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a medical malpractice theory claiming $10 million in damages.

Utah Code section 78B-3-412 mandates that the patient provides each health care provider with 90 days' notice of the intent to file a lawsuit before an injured patient is able to file a medical malpractice suit. This notice is required to include... More...   $1 (04-19-2024 - UT)

Sacramento, California employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on wrongful termination theories.
Zurich Insurance was founded in Switzerland in 1872. The company expanded into North America in 1912 to become a leading provider of commercial property-casualty insurance solutions and services in the U.S. and Canada. A wholly owned subsidiary of the Zurich Insurance Group, Z... More...   $80000000 (04-19-2024 - CA)

Hammond, Indiana personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Porter Superior Court 2, 64D02-2212-CT-010418, and was removed to federal court by C.R. England, Inc. et al.

Indiana follows the rule of modified comparative fault, which is also used by 32 other states. Under Indiana law, you may recover... More...   $1 (04-18-2024 - IN)

Jackson, Mississippi personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Hinds County, Mississippi, 23-00337 and was removed to federal courts by Ronnie B. King. Jr. and Schneider National Carriers, Inc.

Mississippi has a pure comparative negligence system. This means that you can still r... More...   $0 (04-18-2024 - MS)

Sapulpa, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a contract dispute.

Plaintiff claimed that Defendant breached a consulting agreement by which it engaged Plaintiff to perform certain consulting services related to the operation of a duly licensed medical marijuana grow facility.

Defendant denied that it breached the agreement.

Defendant counterclaime... More...   $42300 (04-18-2024 - ok)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant, charged with malicious injury to property - $1,000 or more in violation of 21 O.S. 1760, which provides:



A. Every person who maliciously injures, defaces or destroys any real or personal property not his or her own, in cases other than such as are specified in Section 1761 et seq. of this title, is guilty of:
More...   $0 (04-17-2024 - OK)

Houston, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 80th District Court of Harris County, TX, 22-13419, and was removed to federal court by Fedex.

Texas follows the modified comparative negligence rule, also known as the 51% Bar Rule. This means that if a plaintiff is found to be 50% or les... More...   $1 (04-17-2024 - TX)

Austin, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 126th District Court, Travis County, Texas, D-1-GN-23-000156, and was removed to federal court by The Lane Construction Corporation.

Texas follows the modified comparative negligence rule, also known as the 51% Bar Rule. This means that if ... More...   $1 (04-17-2024 - TX)

Charlotte, North Carolina insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the Mecklenburg County Superior Court, 18-CVS-1254
4th Circuit, 21-02165, Fourth, 24-01316, and was removed to federal court by AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company.

Under the North Carolina Unfair and Deceptive Trade P... More...   $0 (04-17-2024 - NC)

Norfolk, Virginia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory claiming $2.4 million in damages.

If the property owner fails to exercise reasonable care to maintain the premises, which results in injury to the invitee, they could be held liable for damages. Under Virginia law, if the property owner has invited you to visit their premises, you ar... More...   $1 (04-16-2024 - VA)

Danville, Virginia civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an Americans With Disability Violation theory claiming $350,000 in damages.

In May of 2019, Plaintiff Teresa Boelte (“Boelte”) was injured in a workplace accident and, as a result, began receiving workers' compensation benefits. Sometime later, her employer, Defendant Southstone Behavioral Health (“Southst... More...   $0 (04-16-2024 - )

Roanoke, Virginia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory claiming $350,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Virginia uses the pure contributory negligence rule. This is the harshest legal doctrine in personal injury cases involving negligence. The defendant must be 100% at fault for the accident that caused the plaintiff's injuries.

... More...   $0 (04-16-2024 - VA)

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

Williams Scotsman, Inc. operates as a space solutions. The Company provides solutions for instructional, living, health, office, storage and specialty including modular offices, and permanent modular structures.

Colorado state law uses 50% modified comparative negligence. That means... More...   $1 (04-15-2024 - CO)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant, charged with:

Count as Filed: ABDGR, ASSAULT & BATTERY WITH A DANGEROUS WEAPON - AUTOMOBILE, in violation of 21 O.S. 645
Date of Offense: 03/12/2023
W.L.A
Disposed: DEMURRER SUSTAINED, 09/13/2023. Dismissed by Court
Count as Disposed: ASSAULT & BATTERY WITH A DANGEROUS WEAPON - AUTOMOBILE(ABDGR)
Violatio... More...   $0 (04-15-2024 - OK)

Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a medical malpractice negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 101st District Court, Dallas County, TX, DC-20-11332, and was removed to federal court by Oasis Healthcare Partners, L.L.C., et al.

Ella Norman died on April 11, 2020-after contracting COVID-19 at Skyline Nursing Center, a skilled nursi... More...   $1 (04-15-2024 - TX)

Fort Worth, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liability theory.

This case was filed in the County Court at Law No. 3, Tarrant County, Texas, 23-007899-3, and was removed to federal court by Kroger Texas, L.P.

A premises liability action is a form of “negligence” based on a
premises defect theory. The elements to e... More...   $0 (04-15-2024 - TX)

Dallas, Texas personal injury slip and fall lawyers represent the plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.

This case was filed in the 44th District Court, Dallas County, Texas, DC-23-00826, and was removed to federal court by Ross Dress for Less, Inc.

A premises liability action is a form of “negligence” based on a
premises defect theory. The elements to establ... More...   $1 (04-15-2024 - TX)

Fort Worth, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory claims to have suffered $250,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the 153rd Judicial District of Tarrant County, Texas, 153-349632-24, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Where Are 5 Elements of a Negligence case in Texas?

... More...   $0 (04-15-2024 - TX)

Dallas, Texas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 160th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, TX, DC-23-09533, and was removed to federal court by Quantem Aviation Services LLC and Anthony Buckley.

In Texas, negligent parties are held liable for any harms suffered due to their negligence. C... More...   $0 (04-15-2024 - TX)

Dallas, Texas insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

Statutory violations allow a person to hold an insurer liable for damages caused by unreasonable delays in responding to and paying claims and misrepresentations regarding the policy, the claim, or coverage.... More...   $1 (04-15-2024 - TX)

Wilmington, Delaware insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the Superior Court of DE, N22C-03-00087, and was removed to federal court by Allied World Insurance Company.

There are no statutory grounds for a bad faith cause of action in Delaware. Damages recoverable in a bad faith claim inc... More...   $0 (04-15-2024 - DE)