Cape Girardeau, Missouri personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendant on a produce liablity theory.

Dicamba, an herbicide, kills broadleaf weeds that have grown resistant to
other herbicides. Unfortunately, traditional dicamba herbicides harm crops.
Traditional dicamba herbicides are also “volatile,� meaning that they tend to
vaporize and move off ta... More...   $0 (07-07-2022 - MO)

New York, New York intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on copyright infringement theories.


At the end of four-day trial, the jury unanimously found the defendants liable for copyright infringement and defamation. The jury awarded $30, 000 in damages to Plaintiff Muddy Water Pictures LLC (“Muddyâ€�) for infringement of Muddy's copyright in the f... More...   $0 (06-14-2022 - NY)

Anderson, South Carolina plaintiff Personal injury lawyers sued Defendant on constructive notice negligence theories.

On the evening of May 21, 2014, Denise Garrison went to Target in Anderson,
South Carolina with her eight -year-old daughter. Upon her arrival at the store,
Denise parked her car in Target's parking lot, and she and her daughter exited the
vehicle. Before enter... More...   $0 (01-28-2022 - SC)

Dr. Rachel Tudor sued her former employer, Southeastern Oklahoma State
University, under Title VII, claiming discrimination on the basis of sex, retaliation,
and a hostile work environment after Southeastern denied her tenure, denied her the
opportunity to reapply for tenure, and ultimately terminated her from the university.
A jury found in favor of Dr. Tudor on her discrimin... More...   $0 (09-13-2021 - OK)

Liberty, Missouri personal Injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on medical malpractice negligence theories.

Harned has diagnoses of bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. She also has a history of psychosis, and in May, 2016, Harned began experiencing psychotic symptoms. In May and June, 2016, Harned was seen twice at Trum... More...   $0 (07-13-2021 - MO)

Petitioner Asmik Akopyan, M.D., seeks a writ of mandate
compelling the trial court to vacate its order granting real party
in interest Zulma Unzueta’s peremptory challenge to Judge
Anthony J. Mohr under Code of Civil Procedure section 170.61
filed after this court conditionally reversed the judgment entered
after a jury trial in favor of Dr. Akopyan on Unzueta’s claim for
m... More...   $0 (08-25-2020 - CA)

A jury returned verdicts in favor of plaintiff Timothy King against defendant U.S.
Bank National Association (U.S. Bank) for defamation, wrongful termination in violation
of public policy, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing,
awarding King almost $24.3 million in compensatory and punitive damages. U.S. Bank
filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding ... More...   $0 (07-29-2020 - CA)

¶1 Defendant in error, Fielding D. Haas, referred to as plaintiff, commenced proceedings against S.J. Sarkeys, an individual, and Sarkeys, Inc., a corporation, referred to as defendants, to recover attorney's fee allegedly due him. Plaintiff's action was predicated on the grounds that he had, at the request of defendants and each of them, commenced to perform and did perform professional services ... More...   $0 (02-25-2020 - OK)

George Fenimore was 92 and suffering dementia. On
March 27, 2013, his family took him to a local hospital because he
was incontinent and would not shower. This local hospital is not
a defendant.
On March 29, 2013, the local hospital transferred Fenimore
to a second hospital, which was UCLA Resnick Neuropsychiatric
Hospital. Within minutes of arriving at the second hospital,... More...   $0 (01-28-2020 - CA)

Andrew M.’s petition for writ of mandate presents an issue of first impression:
does a conditional reversal and limited remand to the juvenile court to conduct a transfer
hearing pursuant to Proposition 57, the Public Safety and Rehabilitation Act of 2016
(Cal. Const., art. I, § 32), constitute a “new trial” for purposes of exercising a Code of
Civil Procedure section 170.61 challe... More...   $0 (01-07-2020 - CA)

Appellants William Greene, California Consulting Group
(CCG), and R & R Trust1 obtained a judgment in their favor and
against respondent Karen de la Carriere (Carriere). The trial
court declared Greene the prevailing party and awarded him
attorney fees pursuant to a contractual attorney fees provision.
Greene nonetheless appealed, contending the trial court erred in
calcula... More...   $0 (08-31-2019 - CA)

This is the third chapter in our appellate review of this controversy, which
involves the wrongful denial of unemployment benefits by respondents Employment
Development Department (EDD) and the California Unemployment Insurance Board
(Board). After both EDD and the Board rejected a claim for unemployment benefits filed
by Jose Robles—and the trial court denied Robles’s petitio... More...   $0 (08-04-2019 - CA)