Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 11-22-2023

Case Style:

Paul Whitt v. Social Security Administration

Case Number: 7:23-cv-00032

Judge: Edward B. Atkins

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky (Pike County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States Attorney’s Office in Pikeville

Defendant's Attorney:



Click Here For The Best Pikeville Social Security Disability Lawyer Directory




Description: Pikeville, Kentucky social security disability lawyer represent the Plaintiff seeking review of the denial by HHS of his application for Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV benefits.

"Title XIV of the Social Security Act (also known as the Grants to States for Aid and Services to the Aged, Blind, and Disabled) was a federal program that provided financial assistance to states for the purpose of providing aid and services to the aged, blind, and disabled. It was enacted as part of the Social Security Act of 1935.

What were the goals of SSID Tit. XIV?

The primary goals of SSID Tit. XIV were to:

Provide financial assistance to states to help them meet the needs of the aged, blind, and disabled.

Promote the development of state programs for the aged, blind, and disabled.

Encourage states to provide comprehensive and coordinated services to the aged, blind, and disabled.

How did SSID Tit. XIV work?

SSID Tit. XIV provided states with a block grant of federal funding, which states were required to match with state funds. States were then responsible for administering their own programs for the aged, blind, and disabled.

What types of services were provided under SSID Tit. XIV?

The types of services provided under SSID Tit. XIV varied from state to state, but could include:

Financial assistance: This could include cash payments to help with basic needs such as food, shelter, and clothing.

In-home services: This could include assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) such as bathing, dressing, and eating.

Institutional care: This could include care in nursing homes and other residential facilities.

Medical services: This could include coverage for doctor visits, hospital stays, and prescription drugs.

What were the limitations of SSID Tit. XIV?

SSID Tit. XIV had a number of limitations, including:

The amount of federal funding was limited. This meant that states often had to make difficult decisions about how to allocate scarce resources.

The program focused on providing financial assistance rather than promoting independence and self-sufficiency. This meant that some individuals may have been overly reliant on public assistance.

The program was not well-coordinated with other programs that served the aged, blind, and disabled. This could lead to duplication of services and gaps in care.

When did SSID Tit. XIV expire?

SSID Tit. XIV was replaced by the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program in 1974. SSI is a federal program that provides benefits to low-income individuals who are aged, blind, or disabled.

Conclusion

SSID Tit. XIV was a significant program that provided essential financial assistance and services to the aged, blind, and disabled. While the program had its limitations, it played an important role in improving the lives of millions of Americans."

Google Bard

Outcome: 10/30/2023 19 ORDER: the Acting Commissioner's motion to remand 18 is GRANTED. The Commissioner of Social Security's decision is REVERSED pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and this matter is REMANDED to Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. This is a final and appealable order and there is no just cause for delay. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is stricken from Court's active docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 10/30/2023. (RCB) cc: COR (Entered: 10/30/2023)
11/07/2023 20 BILL OF COSTS by Paul Whitt Seeking Reimbursement for $402 Filing Fee. (Smith, Evan) (Entered: 11/07/2023)
11/22/2023 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Robert Carr for review: re 20 BILL OF COSTS Seeking Reimbursement for $402 Filing Fee by Paul Whitt. (TDA) (Entered: 11/22/2023)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: