Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 08-09-2022

Case Style:

City of Tulsa v. Jay Jones, et al.

Case Number: CJ-2021-2784

Judge: Civil Docket F

Court: In the District Court in and for Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Mark Douglas Swiney

Defendant's Attorney:





Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best Tulsa Civil Litigation Lawyer Directory

Description: Tulsa, Oklahoma real property lawyers represented Defendants sued by the City of Tulsa on eminent domain theories seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by Defendants for public use on Union Avenue.

GREENOUGH, KELLY M; CASE COMES ON APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONERS; MARK SWINEY APPEARS FOR PLAINTIFF; MICHAEL PACEWIZ APPEARS FOR DEFENDANTS ST LOUIS AND SAN FRANCISCO RAILROAD AND TEXAS COMPANY AND COSDE; NO OTHER APPEARANCES WERE MADE; INSTRUCTIONS TO COMMISONERS ENTERED; ORDER APPOINTING JAN GORDAN, RICK PETERSON, MAX TANKERSLY ENTERED.

The commissioners appointed by the Court awarded Defendants $1,750.

Outcome: GREENOUGH, KELLY M; CASE COMES ON FOR HEARING VESTING TITLE, DISBURSE JUST COMPENSATION; MARK SWINEY APPEARS BY BLUE JEANS; NO OTHER APPEARANCES WERE MADE; BAILIFF CALLED 3 TIMES IN HALLWAY FOR JAY JONES AND SPOUSE NO APPEARANCES; ORDER VESTING TITLE; ORDER TO DISBURSE JUST COMPENSATION AND JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGMENT; CASE CLOSED ENTERED

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: